... has an important public interest role in the
cultural, ecological, environmental and social fields, and constitutes
a resource favourable to economic activity and whose protection,
management and planning can contribute to job creation;
... Aware
that the landscape contributes to the formation of local cultures and
that it is a basic component of the European natural and cultural
heritage, contributing to human well-being and consolidation of the
European identity;
... Acknowledging
that the landscape is an important part of the quality of life for
people everywhere: in urban areas and in the countryside, in degraded
areas as well as in areas of high quality, in areas recognised as being
of outstanding beauty as well as everyday areas;
... Noting
that developments in agriculture, forestry, industrial and mineral
production techniques and in regional planning, town planning,
transport, infrastructure, tourism and recreation and, at a more
general level, changes in the world economy are in many cases
accelerating the transformation of landscapes;
... Wishing
to respond to the public’s wish to enjoy high quality landscapes and to
play an active part in the development of landscapes;
... Believing
that the landscape is a key element of individual and social well-being
and that its protection, management and planning entail rights and
responsibilities for everyone;
But if these words, above, from the Preamble of the Landscape Conventione are to be transposed all way into people's lives, it is obvious that landscape pictures must be given a great deal of attention... To Landscape & Citizens it's a question of making the picturesque side of landscapein Sweden a driving force of development...
"Pastische Modernism" 
The word used by the group of journalists in Axess nr 4, 2009,
seems OK. Johan Lundberg in a tone of a
grieved Stockholmian man as an editor, sounds quite normal to me
when writing with wrath (!):
”In
this number of Axess we show you the destructive consequences of a
dogmatic modernist understanding of ourselves, an understanding having been allowed
to dominate within architecture and town planning during the 19th
century.But we also want to point to some alternatives within the history of
architecture (...) rplacing self-styled experts with their arbitrary
decrees on what is and what is not within the flow of our time." Perhaps we should jus stop here.
*
Landscape & Citizens however like to add just one more reading tip - somewhat of the same brew, also from 2009:
In a work, Unhealthy Times
(Swedish title on photo to the right) the two ethnologists Jonas Frykman
(Sweden) and Kjell Hansen ( Norway), discuss the hight
rates of bad health, related to social institutional insurance systems, in a perspective
where a rich photo material
from the ensured people's "life settings" in various small Swedish
municipalities seem to have their own say for their well-beings...
Completely
uncommented, though. Still revolutionary... This is an ongoing
work work by a network of European researchers from
different fields...
The big deal in these times of pre-ratification of the European Landscape Convention, seems
to us to be the eternal (in Sweden particularly virulent) question of just how
much planning and what kind of planning - by whom?
- is actually good for a people's health and "life environments?. The words of
the Norwegian Senior Officer, A Moflag, ought probably be cited here once
again not only because of their European approcah, but because they are still going strong: Objections heard from time to time!
Another serie of photos on the same theme;

Landscape: "In favour of Sweden, in our Time"...?
Sweden is one of about ten countries having signed the European Landscape Convention.
However,
we have not yet ratified it.
The most important thing about the Convention is probably that it is defined in relation to "us, human beings"...
Have a look at the famous painting by D D Friedrich "Traveller above the clouds"
that we have taken from the magazine for Sustainable spatial planning of Nature, culture and landscape, Naturopa. In 1998, the former French of Territorial Planning and environment, Dominique Voynet, ( The Greens) wrote this, in 1998, about the "long history" of landscape:
"It
is not possible to discuss landscapes, our surroundings of tomorrow, without referring to the past. In our old continent of Europe, human
beings have been leaving their mark on their environment for thousands
of years, shaping landscapes according to their activities".
Adding about the landscape of her country, she continues:
"landscapes
which might be described as by-products of their economic
atcitivieties". [---] "As a result of our ancestors' unrelenting
efforts we have a tremendous variety of types of scenery and
landscapes, which many countries envy us" ... before summing up: "This state of affaires is incompatible with the wishes of a growing
number of Europeans, who aspire to live and travel in pleasant
suroundings."
In Sweden the book Herrarna i skogen/Lords of the forest (2007) was widely read and cited.
With some pain, obviously Kerstin Ekman acknowledged a non-illusionary view on "landscape" transmitted by
Simon Schama in 1995 in Landscape and Memory: "Objectively, of
course, the various ecosystems that sustain life on the planet proceed
independently of human agency, just as they operated before the hective ascendancy
of Homo sapiens. But it is also true that it is diffficult to think of a
single natural system that has not, for the better or for worse, been
substantially modified by human culture." (---) "And it is the argument
of Landscape and Memory that it is used not for guilt and sorrow but for
celebration."

Less theoretical is a book by cultural reporter of the Swedish Radio, Johannes Ekman, a book from another "Ekman" ( "Man of Oak"), however not related: Skogen i vårt inre - Utmark och frihetsdröm/ The forest inside of us - Outlying lands, dreams of liberty. But it penetrates deeply into the Nordic soul, which seems to cry somewhat for help in a sort poem as the following by Verner Aspenström ( Stream of Aspen): "Oh, these dark forests within us where giants slumber What we call the soul is nothing but a wandering reflex of the sun beneath the trees A clearing where a distorted light may reach" Those
shivering aspen leaves, however - are they not whispering about the
need, in the Far North, for more universal wanderers à
la Friedrich's
first picture?! The risk of self-choking monotony, without! The deeply
human need, to feel, of course, but in fact also to reflect, "... perceive" ... Again, the need for the European Landscape Convention.
© Caspar David Friedrich-bild, Der Chasseur im Walde ( to the left, from book).
Landscape & Citizens believes there is a problem in our society concerning who (ought to), are the real experts on landscape in Sweden?
We have so long had definite expertise in the natural sciences domains,
while more or less neglecting traditional - and changing -
landscapes per se: a field considered "soft". And now? Experts
haven't done their jobs, experts should be redefined...
The Expert Perspective is incredibly deep in Sweden - (participative) democracy in consequence suffering...
- We need more of a Human Rights Perspective within a new field of landscape -
We need a broadening of the list of experts (also suggested
by the Swedish National Heritage Board to the Ministry of Culture
in itsr Proposal of implementation of the ELC) - We need to develop a landscape culture
-
We need more focus ont the really fragile Swedish built environment, all over
the territory (cp the Swedish contribution in Sibiu, European Capital
of Culture, 2007, at the 6th Workshops of the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention
|